Choose a permitted task, keep a starting result for comparison and build a workflow with reusable instructions, permitted inputs and human checks. Practise finding errors and revising the steps.
During the programme
- One repeatable AI-assisted workflow with reusable instructions and permitted inputs.
- Human checks and a starting result for comparison.
- A 90-day test plan and comparison log.
Over the next 90 days
- Repeated test records comparing quality, errors and total time, including checking and corrections.
- A revised workflow and evidence for continuing, changing or stopping its use.
What successful practice looks like
Run the same permitted task with your starting approach and the AI-assisted workflow. Compare quality, errors and total time, including review and rework, using the same method across tests. Use supplied or permitted practice material where workplace permission is absent. Do not assume time savings.
Share attempts, feedback and revisions through WhatsApp support. Completion is based on demonstrated skills, application and honest review. Jobs, paid assignments, increased sales and profit are results to pursue, not guaranteed completion conditions.
Explore the two-day syllabus
Day 1: Define the task and check the response
Choose a task worth testing
Map the task inputs and required output. Record a manual baseline and completion criteria.
Output: A task selection sheet and baseline result.
Set boundaries before entering information
Classify sample inputs by permitted use. Remove unnecessary sensitive details and identify approval needs.
Output: An input-boundary checklist.
Give instructions a colleague could follow
Specify purpose, context, constraints and output format. Revise instructions after comparing results.
Output: A reusable task prompt and revision record.
Check the answer before using it
Compare claims with supplied source material. Identify omissions, unsupported statements and required corrections.
Output: A corrected response and checking checklist.
Day 2: Build a workflow another person can repeat
Write and summarise without losing meaning
Draft for a defined audience. Check a summary against the original facts and decisions.
Output: A checked update and action summary.
Use AI to compare options
Generate options within stated constraints. Compare trade-offs and identify missing information.
Output: An options comparison and decision note.
Build a workflow that can be repeated
Sequence input preparation, AI use and human checks. Test the workflow against the manual baseline.
Output: A tested sequence of work steps, prompt and comparison record.
Apply, measure and revise over 90 days
Plan repeated permitted tests. Define review points and conditions for stopping or revising use. Prepare the records needed for the 90-day application review.
Output: A 90-day test plan and review log. A review template for: Repeated test records comparing quality, errors and total time, including checking and corrections. A revised workflow and evidence for continuing, changing or stopping its use.
See the venue, teaching language and programme hours in the attendance section. Confirm the group size for your cohort. Bring a laptop for the hands-on exercises and keep access to it for the 90-day practice period. No prior technical skills are required. The team will explain the tools and accounts to use. Use only material you have permission to share.
Explore an exercise and its review questions
"The Colleague Test": a peer follows the workflow without help; the author records errors, time and corrections.
Feedback and review: Locate missing instructions and compare quality as well as time.
What you revise or apply: Revise the workflow before testing it on real permitted work.
Inspect a worked example: Give AI a task you can check
Illustrative teaching example. This is fictional, not a participant submission, facilitator feedback record or evidence of results.
- Starting draft
- Write a customer reply.
- Review question
- What facts may it use, what must it avoid and who checks the answer?
- More specific version
- Using this fictional enquiry and approved policy, draft a reply under 120 words. Do not invent a refund promise. Flag missing facts for a person to check.
Try it: write your own starting statement, answer the review question and choose one action you can check afterwards.
